Strictly speaking, Cambridge v. Patton only pertains to e-reserve practices at Georgia State. However, given the ambiguity over the boundaries of educational fair use with respect to academic libraries, many observers expect that the resolution of the case will cause ripple effects in e-reserve policies across the country.
As with the last proposed settlement by the publishers, this new proposal is likely to ruffle feathers among academic librarians.
"The proposed order is clearly intended to humiliate [Georgia State] and to make fair use as difficult as possible for them," wrote Kevin Smith, scholarly communications officer at Duke University, on his blog. "It reads to me like a party who actually won very little at the trial still trying to spike the ball in the other parties’ face."
Monday, June 04, 2012
Georgia State Update from Inside Higher Ed
ISHEd reviews the latest information pertaining to the Georgia State eReserves case (ISHEd)
Labels:
CCC,
Copyright,
Inside Higher Ed
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment