|
Monday, October 19, 2020
MediaWeek Report (Vol 13, No 12): Quarterly Newsletter - Articles of Interest and Consulting Update
Thursday, October 08, 2020
NYU Business School Professor Scott Galloway on the Future of HEd
To kick of this week's virtual ASU+GSV Education Summit, they asked NYU Stern business school professor Scott Galloway to set the stage for education in a time of COVID. And he doesn't disappoint in identifying how warped higher education has become in valuing the wrong key metrics - such as admission rates and failing to address the disparity in administrator compensation and the tuition cost of education. There is much more in this video:
https://virtual.asugsvsummit.com/2020/agenda/session/352440
The video is full of excellent information and scathing opinion:
- NYU boasts that it turns away 89% of applicants - that's like a shelter saying they turned away 9 of 10 homeless people last night
- Higher Education is an "agent of caste" in the US (and not in a good way)
- Stanford is basically run as a hedge fund and should be taxed that way
- Administrators are on a march to 'reduce accountability and increase compensation'
- Equates the top US schools to luxury brands which adopt scarcity as a key component of their business model
- Harvard sells the most expensive content streaming service (at $49,000) the world has ever seen
Well worth a listen.
Tuesday, September 29, 2020
OCLC's Vision for the Next Generation of Metadata
From the OCLC report summary:
Transitioning to the Next Generation of Metadata synthesizes six years (2015-2020) of OCLC Research Library Partners Metadata Managers Focus Group discussions and what they may foretell for the “next generation of metadata.”
The firm belief that metadata underlies all discovery regardless of format, now and in the future, permeates all Focus Group discussions. Yet metadata is changing. Innovations in librarianship are exerting pressure on metadata management practices to evolve as librarians are required to provide metadata for far more resources of various types and to collaborate on institutional or multi-institutional projects with fewer staff.
This report considers: Why is metadata changing? How is the creation process changing? How is the metadata itself changing? What impact will these changes have on future staffing requirements, and how can libraries prepare? This report proposes that transitioning to the next generation of metadata is an evolving process, intertwined with changing standards, infrastructures, and tools. Together, Focus Group members came to a common understanding of the challenges, shared possible approaches to address them, and inoculated these ideas into other communities that they interact with.
Download pdf
Tuesday, September 15, 2020
Is GoodReads A Good or Bad Thing For Books?
It's been a very long tome since Amazon bought up all the viable book recommendation sites - GoodReads included - but over in The New Statesman Sara Manavis suggests that Goodreads is not all good for books. Bad actually.
Apparently the one thing which unifies Goodreads users is that they all agree that the user experience sucks. I always believed Amazon buying these book recommendation and social networking sites was cynical in the first place: Nothing should stop the Amazon juggernaut from dominating your book discovery and reading experience. Amazon were never really interested in the functionality or site 'experience' of these sites, they just wanted the enthusiasts and they were not going to let a potential competitor grow nor allow a real competitor buy up these companies. In 2008, Amazon purchased Shelfari and in 2013 completed the Goodreads deal. There was shock demonstrated at the time and commentators and users felt the sellers had sold out to the bad actor. Many felt betrayed. But, according to the Manavis article there are still more than 90million users which is considerably more than the 16mm members back in 2008.
Since 2008, web design has changed considerably. No surprise there. However, to confirm the thesis that Amazon wasn't really interested in this product per se, the Goodreads website is virtually unchanged since 2008. Manavis notes the frustration of users,
Goodreads today looks and works much as it did when it was launched. The design is like a teenager’s 2005 Myspace page: cluttered, random and unintuitive. Books fail to appear when searched for, messages fail to send, and users are flooded with updates in their timelines that have nothing to do with the books they want to read or have read. Many now use it purely to track their reading, rather than get recommendations or build a community. “It should be my favourite platform,” one user told me, “but it’s completely useless.”
Minavis suggests that the negative feedback has reached some type of breaking point, and I believe there is room in the market for other online booksellers of scale.
When I became CEO of Ingenta, the company was planning a commercial B2C book retail store. We had conversations with publishers, built some wire frames and developed a product concept. We planned to use existing technology (subsequently proven unstable). I had to squelch this initiative to concentrate on saving the company and delivering to current customers. It was actually a very crazy idea given our circumstances stoked by the high (and bizarre) interest of our board. Ingenta had a closet full of ill-conceived poorly executed projects and this would have been a spectacular example.
Looking around for other book recommendation sites, I still use LibraryThing but even they have some corporate overlords. LibraryThing is majority owned by the founder Tim Spalding but he counts both Amazon and Proquest as partial owners. LibraryThing hasn't changed much over the years either but I don't have anything like the frustration some of the Goodreaders seem to have. Maybe they should come over.
Wednesday, September 09, 2020
Apple Daily and Jimmy Lai: Trying to save democracy in Hong Kong
and a more structured approach to processes, personnel roles and responsibilities. We also provided best practices relative to newspaper publishing and profiled a number of the major workflow package providers for newspapers.
Tuesday, September 08, 2020
Monday, August 17, 2020
Pirated Broadcast Content Worth $1Billion or More - Report
- Conservatively, pirate subscription IPTV services generate subscription revenues of $1 billion annually in the U.S. alone, even excluding the sale of pirate streaming devices used to receive the content;
- Because the providers of these services pay nothing for the programming that makes up their core product, they operate with estimated profit margins that range from 56 percent (retailers) to 85 percent (wholesalers).
- An estimated 9 million fixed broadband subscribers in the U.S. use a pirate subscription IPTV service;
- At least 3,500 storefront websites, social media pages, and stores within online marketplaces sell pirate subscription IPTV services to the U.S. market;
- An ecosystem has emerged around such services, including wholesalers that provide turnkey technology, and retailers that offer the stolen content to the public; and
- The ecosystem also depends upon legitimate players, including hosting services, payment processors, and social media. The extent to which these legitimate players are aware of their role is a subject of debate
Wednesday, August 12, 2020
Pew Research into Digital Innovation 2030
A majority expect significant reforms aimed at correcting problems in democratic institutions and representation will take place in the next decade. Many say this will result in positive outcomes for the public good; others are less convinced.
The full article is worth a read but here are two snips of interest:
Monday, August 10, 2020
Digitial First Textbooks - My Interview with CCC's Beyond the Book
As print textbooks eventually do give way to courseware, industry analyst Michael Cairns says, college professors, administrators and students will appreciate an education delivered in 21st century models. Listen to the Audio here
While it has long been foretold that the print textbook would disappear, the revolution has actually taken quite a bit longer than people anticipated.
As print textbooks eventually do give way to courseware, industry analyst Michael Cairns says, college professors, administrators and students will appreciate an education delivered in 21st century models.
“Textbooks served a tremendous benefit and purpose for the last 200 years or more and were quite useful in the marketplace,” he tells CCC’s Chris Kenneally.
“But when you see some of the ability to build in and make use of technology in the delivery of the content and the delivery of subjects, [you see that] students can have the opportunity to benefit from better products and more effective outcomes from the materials that they have access to through the classroom.”
The discussion was presented by the Textbook & Academic Authors Association as part of its special summer webinar series.
Alternatively, read the transcript of the interview here.







