HarperCollins reported fourth quarter operating income of $28 million and full year operating income of $160 million, an improvement of $7 million and $1 million as compared to the prior year periods, respectively. Current quarter results were led by strong sales of Bright Shiny Morning by James Frey, Stolen Innocence by Elissa Wall and an updated edition of YOU:The Owner's Manual by Michael F. Roizen and Mehmet Oz. During the fourth quarter, HarperCollins had 62 books on The New York Times bestseller list, including Read All About It! by Laura and Jenna Bush which reached number one. For the full year, HarperCollins had 165 books on The New York Times bestseller list, including 14 titles reaching the number one spot.Thus the company had a margin improvement of 1pp in the final quarter but a slight decline over all. Well reported has been the change in senior management at Harpercollins with Brian Murray replacing Jane Friedman. Murray, in turn, has made changes in the executive suite notably the replacement of Glenn D'Agnes who was the long term COO.
How far off are we from the new library that has no physical holdings, no ILS system, no repositories, no nothing except the building, a patron database, some furniture and some terminals?We can see two important directions, one towards concentration and one towards diffusion.
First concentration, which we see at at least three levels. At the institutional level, there is a strong push to overcoming fragmentation by moving towards new institutional discovery layers (Primo, Encore, Worldcat Local). At the group level we see the emergence of more state or national systems which pull together resources in user-facing services. These are attractive because they present more resources to the user. And at the global level, we see library resources being represented - through linking or syndication strategies - in search engines, Flickr, Google Scholar, Worldcat and other network level resources.The second is atomization of content and services so that they can be better integrated into diffuse networking device and applications environments. Here think of RSS/AtomPub, mobile interfaces, APIs, alerting services, portlets and widgetization, persistent links to library services and content, etc. Issues here are technical and licensing. Users increasingly value convenience and relevance, and packaging materials in ways that make most sense for them is not always straightforward.
He is a pirate. Coelho discovered the power of free when a fan posted a Russian translation of one of his novels online and book sales there climbed from 3,000 to 100,000 to 1m in three years. "This happened in English, in Norwegian, in Japanese and Serbian," he said. "Now when the book is released in hard copy, the sales are spectacular." So Coelho started linking to pirated versions of his books from his own website. But when he bragged about this at the Burda Digital Lifestyle Design conference in Munich last January, he got in trouble with his US publisher, HarperCollins, whose then head, Jane Friedman, called him.
But I'll tell you what does make my jaw drop: the seemingly widely-held notion that these book sections are being adequately replaced by blogs. To be sure, there are some excellent book blogs out there: Mark Sarvas's The Elegant Variation. The National Book Critics Circle's Critical Mass. MediaBistro's Galley Cat. Jessa Crispin's Bookslut. The Boston Globe's Off the Shelf. And, of course, the New York Times' Paper Cuts. They're all bookmarked on my computer. I read them often for news on new titles (and older ones I missed) and Q&As with authors. Many of them are also good for stories on publishing trends, which as a book publicist and editor I appreciate a great deal. But, for the most part, these blogs don't actually review books.In my view there is a macro point that makes her argument largely irrelevant; that is, we are beginning to see the development of trust networks. As consumers of information we are starting to build our own networks of people and entities we rely on to support everything from our political philosophy to our choice in vacation spot. Reading falls squarely into that paradigm and it no longer matters whether a book review is produced to the standard of the LA Times or The NYTimes book section (and many blog reviews do), what matters is the impact the review has on a purchase decision. Those interested in reading are finding bloggers that they 'trust' (even of the blogspot variety, a comment which baffles me), and these reviews do indeed 'adequately' fill the void created by the demise of some of the larger newspaper reviews sections. Interesting, some of the arguments presented by Warren as to why these blogs are not of a standard are precisely the items that lend reality, personality and connection to the readers of these reviews.
I'd also advise that book reviewing bloggers jettison the use of personal pronouns (yes, I've used a slew of them here; you can nail me in the comments). And for goodness sake, I wish they'd stop telling me what their father and their girlfriend -- or their father's girlfriend -- thought of the book. Also, I don't need to know how they came to possess the book -- how they borrowed it from the library, or bought it at B&N, or snagged a galley at The Strand, or got the publisher to send them a copy even though they average four hits a day. The banal back-story is of little interest.It is my own personal view that the back story is of little interest; however, that might only be because I haven't found a (blog) reviewer that I identify with. The point is, many consumers reading these blog reviews do find the back story interesting and the great thing is they can move on to someone else if it becomes too tedious. Warren also speaks of 'self-indulgence' and surely nothing could be more self-indulgent than reading a Salman Rushdie review of a Martin Amis title in the NYTimes book review section. (If you would).
Online reputation company Rapleaf has released a new study of 49.3 million people, revealing gender and age data about social network users. On most of the main social networks - including MySpace, Facebook, Bebo, Hi5 - women outnumber men by a considerable amount. On Facebook, the 18-24 age group is largest, with 1,685,029 women in that age group compared to 977,753 men. In MySpace, the same age group dominates, with 7,091,214 women and 5,226,788 men.Informa announced late last week that they had received an indication of interest from a new group. The Guardian finds out it's Dubai. But Blackstone is seen as a favorite by The Times. The Times Online reports on the self-publishing market for authors with a provocative lead-in. One Kindle, Two Kindle, Three Kindle... TechCrunch tries to get to the bottom of the sales numbers. Torstar reports better quarterly results for Harlequin:
Book Publishing revenue was $118.9 million in the second quarter, up $2.9 million from $116.0 million in the same period last year. Underlying revenues were up $6.3 million in the quarter with strong growth in the North America Retail division partially offset by a decrease of $3.4 million from the unfavourable impact of foreign exchange rates. Operating profit was $18.5 million in the second quarter of 2008, up $6.0 million from $12.5 million in 2007. Corporate costs were $4.2 million in the second quarter of 2008, down $0.6 million from the second quarter of 2007.Guards say they locked him up in a cupboard. Not true, says Rushdie and threatens to sue. He may have a chance. Guardian (no relation) Some spectacular declines in magazine readership in the UK. BrandRepublic
Maxim will be the hardest hit of the men's monthlies, but Bauer Media-owned titles Arena and FHM, with news-stand circulation expected to be down 20% and 17% respectively, IPC-owned Loaded (expected to be down around 20%) and NatMags-owned Esquire (expected to be down 19%) are all understood to have suffered in the latest ABCs, released on 14 August.Things continue as expected at Voyager Learning. Still no filings, revenues are in decline and cash is tight. SEC
The Company anticipates it will file its 2006 10-K by July 31, 2008. It further expects that the 2007 10-K will be filed four to eight weeks after the filing of the 2006 10-K. The Company provided preliminary and unaudited 2007 financial results for the Voyager Learning Company operating business by means of a conference call on April 15, 2008. As the Company has continued its efforts to file 2006 and 2007 financials, certain estimates made April 15, 2008 have been updated resulting in a change to the projected 2007 earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). EBITDA is now expected to be in the range of $28 - $29 million versus the previously reported $30 million.
Many of the retailers that participate in the ABE network may already participate in the Amazon network nevertheless this will solidify the persistent mingling of new and second hand titles that publishers have grown to loath. Amazon purchased another second hand and antiquarian book network (may have been more of a search tool) name biblio(something - can't recall) which established their early position in this segment but the acquisition of ABE will radically broaden their reach. Where this leaves Alibris is also of interest. Will they see a need to merge with a larger retailer. We all know Steve Riggio likes old books....Russell Grandinetti, vice president of books for Amazon.com, said that the acquisition would add "breadth and expanded selection" to the company's customers. "AbeBooks provides a wide range of services to both sellers and
customers, and we look forward to working with them to further grow their business. We're excited to present all of our customers with the widest selection of books available any place on Earth."Hannes Blum, AbeBooks' chief executive, said he was "very excited" about the acquisition. "This deal brings together book sellers and book lovers from around the world, and offers both types of customers a great experience," he said.
