On the Hudson

EMAP Dispose of Consumer Titles

After a half year process that at times appeared confused, EMAP announced this morning that they have agreed to sell their consumer magazine and radio business to Heinrich Bauer Verlag KG for £1.14 billion in cash. It appears to represent an excellent deal for shareholders who will receive a special dividend of the proceeds. From the announcement:

Emap has entered into agreements with Heinrich Bauer Verlag KG ("Bauer") to sell Emap Consumer Media and Emap Radio for a total consideration of £1.14 billion on a cash free, debt free basis. This represents a multiple of 2.2x pro forma 2007 revenue and 11.2x pro forma 2007 operating profit and offers a compelling opportunity for Emap shareholders to crystallise value from the two divisions.

Following the sale, the company states that they will refocus intently on their B2B business as a stand alone business. The affirmed that they have terminated any on-going discussions they had with potential acquirers. Clearly, they were not seeing the value here from the prospective purchasers and have decided to carry the unit for the foreseeable time. Some analysts have suggested the advertising outlook for 2008 could be dim and therefore forward financial projections were probably muted.

While Bauer is already big - 166 magazines in 14 countries on three continents and nearly E2.0Billion in revenues - this represents an important expansion for the company. They will immediately gain a substantial position in broader consumer content and english language publishing.

Alun Cathcart, Executive Chairman of Emap, said:

“We are pleased to have achieved a successful outcome in the review of Emap’s Group structure. The price achieved for Emap Consumer Media and Emap Radio fully reflects the value of the two divisions. Emap will now be a focused B2B company with strong market positions, strong cash flow and a proven management team and track record in delivering value and growth.”

Press release

Kindle: An e-platform for the masses?

In mid 1998 I had an audience with Jeff Bezos together with several French publishers. During the meeting the conversation moved to a discussion about what Amazon.com was going to be when it grew up. The supposed genius in the group (me) volunteered that Amazon would remain true to its book retail focus and not become some type of on-line mall. At the time, Amazon remained very close mouthed about their plans but in retrospect it's my suspicion they had every intention of becoming the emporium we now know them to be; moreover, they knew exactly how they were going to get there. Since the launch of Kindle, I have thought a lot about this meeting in 1998 because I don't believe anyone has a clue what Amazon sees as the future of this device.

Tim O'Reilly blogs about the relationship between ebook pricing and attention. There is obviously more to the post than that and the comments are worth a read as well. His article argues a salient point: Because reading is an 'active' past-time there is only a certain amount we can read given the time we have available. Raising or lowering prices will not (de)increase the "supply of time" dedicated to reading. In other words, I can only read one book a week and even if book two were free it wouldn't mean I could somehow read two.

The price of the Kindle is approximately $300. I would argue, rather than reducing ebook prices to $5.99 (versus print prices of $20) the pricing for the device should be similar to the razor blade/razor model. Even then I am not sure the model would work. Why? Because most readers don't read that many books. Most of the readers of publishing blogs like this one, O'Reilly Radar and those with a publishing audience represent a skewed view of the appeal of reading. We all love it and we all do a lot of it. Regrettably, the rest of America is not like us and on average the average book buyer will read less than 3 books per year. (Research studies note that even 'book buyers' are a small group).

So aside from early adopters and techno-fadists who flocked to acquire the first Kindles who will buy the next batch? If the average reader buys three books a year for a total of $90-100, why would they buy an ebook reader for $300 even if those three books were free? Your average consumer is not a dummy and can do the math.

So what of Amazon? They absolutely have the best information available about purchases so perhaps they believe they can sell enough Kindles to the small segment that reads over 10 (or 'x') books per year: I wonder about that. It would seem to me that on the basis of ebook sales alone for use on the Kindle, the device will be a failure. I believe the Kindle represents the first generation e-platform rather than a pure ebook reader. Amazon has a much broader view of how and what content will migrate to the Kindle.

There has been much discussion, argument and commentary about the Kindle and what it means but one thing is clear to me. Amazon has a plan that most likely exceeds our expectation about the positioning of this device. What that is I can only speculate but I suspect as an e-platform they will aggressively start establishing content relationships with all kinds of publishers, content providers, service providers and broadcasters to build out this device beyond the book world. Just like Amazon.com, books may represent the strong footings of the business but it won't be all they do on the Kindle. Any discussion about pricing ebook versions of paper books likely misses the point in terms of their long term strategy.

Reading Stutters

Some time contributor to this blog Andrew Grabois writes about the recent reports on reading over at beneaththecover.com. He discusses the results of the recent National Endowment for the Arts study and the Progress in International Reading study:

Now, on the heels of the NEA’s gloomy assessment, comes the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS). Based on tests given to 215,000 10-year-olds from 45 countries and provinces, and data gleaned from background surveys of pupils, their parents and teachers, the findings tell the same sad story. Since 2001, the U.S. dropped from 4th place to 18th place; the U.K., from 3rd to 19th. The average scores for U.S. and U.K. students did not drop as much as their places on the new list would suggest, but they didn’t make any progress compared with the spectacular improvement shown by 10-year-olds in Russia, some Canadian provinces, Hong Kong, and Singapore. The best that can be said is that the average scores for children from the world’s two largest book markets were above the international mean. So far, there’s been no official response to our relatively poor showing.

Here is the link.

Beware: Your truck may not fit!

With the advent of Amazon.com, the publishing community rapidly understood the value of deeper descriptive information necessary to merchandise products in the virtual world. Initially, we were concerned with provision of cover images and marketing blurbs, then author bios and tables of content and on everafter. Our experience is not unique and in all industries and product segments deeper more descriptive information is now being sought to enable web browsers, service providers and consumers to make better more informed decisions.

There are many examples but I was immediately struck in this article about satellite navigation and driving instructions in the UK. The article (NYTimes) focuses on the negative impact of computerized driving instructions and how they can sometimes be too literal. It is no longer a matter of simply providing a geographic description and route map between two points. As more and more people and vehicles rely on these systems, the data elements required to build a viable route that doesn't create some of the issues mentioned in this article will need to include items such as road width, (tight) turnings, bridge weight limits, speed limits, hill length, season variations - like snow or ice conditions - and the list could go on and on. From the article:

“Foreign drivers very much depend on sat nav systems when they’re coming to a different country, and they are following them rather more blindly than they ought to,” Mr. Dossetter said. Last month, a Slovakian truck driver arrived in Dover, bound for Wales with 22 tons of paper. But, directed off the highway and onto increasingly narrow roads by his navigation system, he ended up wedged on a tiny lane between two houses in Mereworth, a village in Kent, whereupon he had a panic attack, jumped out of his truck, and burst into tears. “He got back in his lorry and tried to maneuver his way out, but he was starting to scrape against the front walls,” Mark Siggers, a resident, told a local newspaper. He also knocked down the village’s power cables, cutting off the electricity. It took the authorities several days to remove his mangled truck.

Imagine the poor guy having to report back to head office that he got their truck wedged between two buildings. Just exactly how these navigation systems will incorporate this deeper (metagraphic?) data into their systems so mistakes like these don't happen could represent a monumental task. It is a problem perhaps perfectly placed for the application of social networking. The truck driver above should be able to wipe away the tears and document his experience in some manner that will improve the navigation for the next European truck driver.

The lesson of Amazon.com is that the development of better descriptive information is an on going struggle; Amazon hasn't stopped improving merchandising and has always recognized the more data elements the better. I suspect that many other industries are and will embark on data collection efforts (and seek data from their vendors and customers) that improves the service or products they provide.

Cengage Swoop on HM College Division

Cengage announced they have reached a definitive agreement to acquire the College publishing assets of Houghton Mifflin for $750mm in cash. The companies also announced that on closing they would work together to expand the distribution of Cengage’s college textbooks and related materials into the U.S. high school market, with particular emphasis on Advanced Placement and Honors programs. From the press release:

“We’re very pleased to acquire the well-respected assets of HM College, which are highly complementary to our existing business,” said Ronald Dunn, President and CEO of Cengage Learning. “We look forward to combining the people, products and publishing programs of HM College and Cengage Learning to expand and enhance our range of services for students, instructors and institutions in the higher education market.”

The divestiture will enable Houghton Mifflin to focus on its K-12 education products but it will undoubtedly strengthen Cengage's position in College. How valuable the marketing agreement will be is unknown although selling College text into the high school market has been growing over the past five years.

Importantly, Cengage has demonstrated that despite the huge price paid for the business they are able to go back to the well (bankers) to make this acquisition. Their investors recognise that the base business is doing well and this acquisition represents an opportunity to strengthen their market position. Perhaps this is at the expense of Houghton Mifflin whos banks announced last week that they could not sell their loan syndication.

On a related note, Cengage presented a brief overview of their first quarter performance and they reported consolidated revenues of $650.1mm up 5.1% versus the same period last year. Operating Income of $247.1mm was up 10% (before allocations and amortization). Higher ed and International delivered strong performance with revenues up 7% and 13% respectively. The library division (Gale) under performed with revenues and operating income off 5.9%. During the conference call CEO Ron Dunn listed several areas where the company is focusing their attention. These include establishing their new leadership team, driving revenue growth, reorganization of international and merging higher ed and professional publishing.

ACAP is Implemented

At a conference in New York yesterday, World Association of Newspapers President Gavin O'Reilly updated the content community on the status of the ACAP initiative. ACAP is a technology that updates the manner in which web search robots search and index material on the web. The ACAP protocol aims to create a more balanced approach to gathering web content and enabling content owners to 'publish' specific rights information applicable to their content which can then be read by the search tool. Rather than limit the amount of free content available to web users, content owners participating in this initiative believe the ultimate outcome will be to make more content available by bringing content from behind subscription walls.

All content owners are being encouraged to implement version 1 of the protocol and Times Online announced that they have implemented ACAP on their site. From the Associated Press:

The proposal, unveiled by a consortium of publishers at the global headquarters of The Associated Press, seeks to have those extra commands — and more — apply across the board. Sites, for instance, could try to limit how long search engines may retain copies in their indexes, or tell the crawler not to follow any of the links that appear within a Web page. The current system doesn't give sites "enough flexibility to express our terms and conditions on access and use of content," said Angela Mills Wade, executive director of the European Publishers Council, one of the organizations behind the proposal. "That is not surprising. It was invented in the 1990s and things move on."

Personally, I was initially skeptical about this initiative but they have delivered on their time table, retained their broad support and even have some in the search community actively supporting the initiative.

ACAP organizers tested their system with French search engine Exalead Inc. but had only informal discussions with others. Google, Yahoo and Microsoft Corp. sent representatives to the announcement, and O'Reilly said their "lack of public endorsement has not meant any lack of involvement by them." Danny Sullivan, editor in chief of the industry Web site Search Engine Land, said robots.txt "certainly is long overdue for some improvements."

Associated Press