The Satire Bites...and Leaves a Mark

Don't we just love watching The Daily Show and Late Night and the skewering which takes place all in the name of fun? Sometimes this satirical "fake news" can cascade into the scatological - particularly The Daily Show commentaries, and new research published in The Journal of Experimental Psychology (and available via PsycNet subscription) demonstrates that satire can pack a punch and will frequently result in the dehumanization of the target.

Long considered the harmless cousin of criticism, satire may in fact be the more dangerous sibling. A recent study entitled Softening the blow or sharpening the blade: Examining the reputational effects of satire. by Hooria Jazaieri (Santa Clara University) and Derek D. Rucker (Northwestern University) suggests that satire, despite its comedic veneer, inflicts greater reputational damage than direct critique. The authors set out to test two hypotheses: Does satire soften the blow or does it negatively sharpen the impact. Their findings favor the latter.

The study examined how satirical content—memes, videos, and commentary—affects public perception. Participants exposed to satirical portrayals of individuals, both real and fictional, consistently rated those individuals less favorably than those exposed to straightforward criticism. Satire, it turns out, does not merely mock—it dehumanizes.

Read a profile of Stewart in a recent Poynter article - When Satire became trusted news.

A linguistic analysis of more than 100,000 YouTube comments revealed that satire prompted viewers to use language that stripped its targets of human qualities. This dehumanization, measured using the Mind Attribution Scale, was found to mediate the reputational harm. In short, satire makes people seem less capable of thought, emotion and agency—and thus less worthy of respect. (Note: The Mind Attribution Scale (MAS) is a questionnaire designed to measure the extent to which individuals attribute mental states, specifically agency and experience to others). 

To determine whether there exists a counter to this impact, the researchers tested a psychological intervention: asking participants to imagine a pleasant interaction with the satirical target. This brief exercise, lasting no more than two minutes, significantly reduced the reputational damage. The imagined contact restored perceptions of the target’s humanity, blunting satire’s sting.

So, consider this 'mission accomplished?' In an age where satire proliferates across social media and entertainment platforms, its reputational consequences are often overlooked - although, some could also argue undermining reputationally and otherwise is the objective. The researchers argue that far from being a benign form of commentary, satire is a potent weapon—one that shapes public opinion more effectively than direct criticism. The ethical ramifications are considerable, particularly when satire targets individuals unable to respond or defend themselves.

APA's PsycArticles contains more than 250,000 full text research articles in psychology but many of these articles have real world business implications relevant to researchers and students in academic disciplines outside psychology and social sciences.