The survey also contained devastating news for those publishers hoping to co-ordinate attempts to charge. When Guardian readers were asked whether they would pay £2 a month to read their favourite paper online, 26% said yes. But if all newspapers charged? The proportion prepared to pay for the Guardian might have been expected to rise. Instead it fell to 16%. This seems odd, until one considers readers’ promiscuity. Faced with having to spend rather a lot to keep snacking from a wide variety of news sources, they protested. The questions are hypothetical, and people may react differently when and if pay walls actually go up. But this will hardly encourage newspaper owners.
Personanondata (aka Michael Cairns) is about the academic, scholarly and professional publishing industry. Here I offer my opinion, analysis, annual predictions and news stories about the industry (and sometimes other things that interest me). My focus is on the application of technology within the industry as it transitions from a business dominated by print to one dependent on digital content creation and delivery.
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
News Reader's Promiscuity
An early December article in The Economist looked at some research into the habits of newspaper readers particularly noting the impact on readership should content be paid (Link):
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment